State Focus 12 of 12
State Focus Jharkhand Institution Law & Courts Polity & Governance

A tribunal instead of a civil court: the forum behind the Rs 8 lakh railway compensation ruling

This background goes with the Jharkhand High Court's award of Rs 8 lakh to a family whose claim the Railway Claims Tribunal had dismissed. The Tribunal is set up under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, and claims for compensation arising from railway accidents and untoward incidents go to it instead of a civil court. An appeal from its order lies to the High Court under Section 23(1) of the same Act, which is the route the Jharkhand case took. Compensation amounts are fixed by the Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990. The Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2003 govern how such an incident is investigated, and Rule 13 requires the Divisional Railway Manager's report, whose absence weighed against the Railways in that case.

Governing Act: Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Appeal provision: Section 23(1) Compensation rules: Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990
Why it matters for exams: Names the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, its Section 23(1) appeal route to the High Court, the Compensation Rules of 1990 and Rule 13 of the 2003 investigation rules.
Kerala PSCUPSCSSC
27 October 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

Railway Claims Tribunal — The tribunal that decides compensation claims from railway accidents and untoward incidents, in place of a civil court.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.