National 9 of 12
National Elections Law & Courts Polity & Governance

Election Commission tells the Supreme Court all three Special Intensive Revision orders were unanimous

In an affidavit in Rakesh Kumar Singh v. Union of India, the Election Commission of India told the Supreme Court that all three of its orders on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by the Chief Election Commissioner and the two Election Commissioners. The affidavit was filed by Deputy Election Commissioner Bhanu Prakash Yeturu. It said decisions follow Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which favours unanimity and provides for a majority decision otherwise. The Commission denied amending Form 6, saying only the Central Government can amend that form under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and that the Special Intensive Revision declaration is a separate document. It also said a committee of experts from IIT Madras and IISc Bengaluru has been formed to review the ECINet platform, and that a plea to restrain the Chief Election Commissioner is not maintainable in view of Article 324(5) of the Constitution.

SIR orders said to be unanimous: 3
Why it matters for exams: Article 324, the composition of the Election Commission and the 2023 Act on the appointment of Election Commissioners are core Polity material.
Kerala PSCUPSC
26 October 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

SIR Special Intensive Revision — The Election Commission's intensive house-to-house revision of electoral rolls.

Form 6 Form 6 — The form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 for including a new name in the electoral roll.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.