State Focus 1 of 8
State Focus Madhya Pradesh Court ruling Law & Courts Polity & Governance

Madhya Pradesh High Court imposes a lakh rupees in costs on a municipal officer who used omitted sections

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has imposed costs of Rs 1,00,000 on an officer of the Indore Municipal Corporation for passing an order under provisions that no longer exist.
The case is Bafgna Hospital v. Indore Municipal Corporation, reported as 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 436.
Sections 143, 146 and 153 of the Municipal Corporation Act had been omitted in 2020, but the officer relied on them while issuing an order and a ledger report.
Of the costs, Rs 75,000 is to be deposited with the Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority and Rs 25,000 paid to the petitioner as litigation costs.
The Corporation agreed to withdraw both the order and the ledger report.
The Court said the withdrawal did not excuse the error, which it described as utter ignorance of the law and a waste of judicial time.
It said the costs were being imposed as an example to statutory authorities, because such litigation is funded by public money.

Costs: Rs 1,00,000 Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 436
Why it matters for exams: It states the principle that an order under a repealed or omitted provision is bad in law, and names the State Legal Services Authority.
Kerala PSCUPSC
29 October 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

SLSA State Legal Services Authority — The body constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act to provide free legal aid in a State.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.