National 1 of 10
National Judgment Polity & Governance

Supreme Court declines to lift the freeze on four Indian Bank accounts of the Trinamool Congress

A Supreme Court bench of Justice M M Sundresh and Justice P B Varale declined to interfere with the freezing of four Indian Bank accounts of the Trinamool Congress. The bench said it was not inclined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution and refrained from going into the merits. It requested the Calcutta High Court to expedite the hearing of the main matter, where proceedings on the frozen funds are pending. The accounts, at the Harish Mukherjee Road branch of Indian Bank, were frozen by the West Bengal Police following a complaint filed on 18 June 2026 by MLA Biswanath Das. The party told the court that it needs ₹12.15 crore a month for its operations. The Calcutta High Court had on 27 August 2026 declined interim relief to operate these four accounts.

Bench: Justice M M Sundresh and Justice P B Varale Accounts frozen: Four, at Indian Bank, Harish Mukherjee Road branch Monthly requirement stated by the party: ₹12.15 crore
Why it matters for exams: Article 136 and the Supreme Court's discretionary special leave jurisdiction are standard polity questions, and this order shows how that discretion is exercised.
Kerala PSCUPSC
1 October 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

Article 136 Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court — It lets the Supreme Court grant special leave to appeal from any judgment or order of any court or tribunal in India, at its discretion.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.