National 2 of 9
National Judgment Law & Courts Polity & Governance

Tenth Schedule pleas must be decided quickly even when an Assembly has time left, Supreme Court holds

The Supreme Court has directed the Speaker of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly to decide within two months a disqualification petition pending against MLA Nirmala Sapre. The Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana laid down a wider rule: a petition under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, the anti-defection law, must be decided quickly even if there is no immediate urgency and even if considerable time is left before the Assembly's term ends. Sapre is a first-time MLA from Bina in Sagar district who won the seat on an Indian National Congress ticket in 2023. The petition against her was filed in July 2024 by the Leader of the Opposition, Umang Singhar, on the ground that she voluntarily gave up her Congress membership. It has been pending for over two years. The High Court had refused to set a time limit, finding no urgency; the Supreme Court took the opposite view. The Tenth Schedule, inserted by the Fifty-second Amendment in 1985, lets a presiding officer disqualify a member for defection.

Time given to the Speaker: two months Assembly: Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly MLA: Nirmala Sapre, Bina, Sagar district Constitutional provision: Tenth Schedule Bench: Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana
Why it matters for exams: The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution is the anti-defection law, inserted by the Fifty-second Amendment Act of 1985, and the presiding officer decides disqualification under it - a core Polity question.
Kerala PSCUPSCSSC
4 November 2026 Source: Verdictum

In plain words

Tenth Schedule Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India — The anti-defection law, added in 1985, under which a presiding officer can disqualify a legislator for defection.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.