State Focus 6 of 8
State Focus Rajasthan Judiciary Polity & Governance

Courts should not disturb a bona fide technical evaluation of an infrastructure project, Rajasthan High Court holds

The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation against a one way underpass at the Purani Chungi Junction on Ajmer Road in Jaipur.
The Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjay K Agrawal and Justice Sameer Jain decided Gyanesh Kumar Sharma v State of Rajasthan and others.
The project is being executed by the Jaipur Development Authority on approvals given by its Public Works Committee.
The Bench held that a court must show restraint when a public interest litigation attacks a contractual or tender decision, and should step in only where the decision is arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable, malafide or illegal.
Review under Article 226 looks at the legality and fairness of the decision making process, not at the merits of the choice made, the Court said, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Jagdish Mandal v State of Orissa.
Finding no material to show that the project was against the public interest, it held that a bona fide technical evaluation should not be interfered with and dismissed the petition.

Project: One way underpass at Purani Chungi Junction, Ajmer Road, Jaipur Executing authority: Jaipur Development Authority Precedent relied on: Jagdish Mandal v State of Orissa
Why it matters for exams: The durable facts are the Jaipur Development Authority, the limits of judicial review under Article 226 over tender and contract decisions, and the Supreme Court's test in Jagdish Mandal v State of Orissa.
Kerala PSCUPSC
4 November 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

JDA Jaipur Development Authority — The statutory urban development authority for the Jaipur region.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.