National 7 of 12
National Court Polity & Governance

Karnataka High Court strikes down provisions raising SC/ST reservation beyond the 50% ceiling

On Monday, 12 October 2026, a Division Bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice K.S. Hemalekha of the Karnataka High Court struck down Section 4 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions and of Appointments or Posts in the Services under the State) Act, 2022, and Section 3 of the Act insofar as it takes aggregate reservation beyond the 50% ceiling. The Act raised Scheduled Caste reservation from 15% to 17% and Scheduled Tribe reservation from 3% to 7%; with reservation for other backward classes (OBC) of 32% unchanged, aggregate reservation rose from 50% to 56%. The Court held that the 50% ceiling is a firm rule grounded in the equality clauses, not a rule of prudence or an ad hoc, elastic rule, and that it admits departure only in extraordinary circumstances. It held that population growth, and reservation being lower than population share, are not extraordinary circumstances. Section 3 was struck down as violating Articles 14 and 15, and Section 4 as violating Articles 14 and 16. The Act, which replaced an Ordinance, came into effect retrospectively from 1 November 2022 and was based on the Nagamohan Das Commission Report.

SC reservation: 15% raised to 17% by the Act (struck down) ST reservation: 3% raised to 7% by the Act (struck down) Aggregate reservation: 50% raised to 56%, with reservation for other backward classes (OBC) of 32% unchanged Bench: Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice K.S. Hemalekha
Why it matters for exams: The 50% reservation ceiling and the Articles 14, 15 and 16 behind it are core polity topics, and this High Court ruling applies them.
Kerala PSCUPSCSSC
12 October 2026 Source: Verdictum

In plain words

50% ceiling Ceiling on aggregate reservation — The Court traced this rule from M.R. Balaji to Indra Sawhney and held it a firm rule with an exception only in extraordinary circumstances.

Nagamohan Das Commission Commission whose report the 2022 Act was based on — The Court found that it proceeded on proportionate representation, though Article 16(4) speaks of adequate representation.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.