Kerala Kerala Law Polity & Governance

Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act and the presumption of a child's legitimacy

The Kerala High Court has held that a DNA test cannot be ordered as a matter of course merely on the basis of a dispute over the paternity of a child born during the subsistence of a valid marriage. Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 embodies a rule of public policy intended to protect the legitimacy of children born during a valid marriage. Under the provision, such a birth is treated as conclusive proof of legitimacy unless it is shown that the spouses had no access to each other at the time when the child could have been conceived. Without specific pleadings and prima facie material showing non-access between the spouses during the relevant period, a direction for DNA profiling cannot be sought. Proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are concerned with adjudicating domestic violence and granting statutory reliefs, not with determining biological parentage. An understanding reached during mediation is relevant and deserves consideration, but parties cannot by consent compel a court to pass an order contrary to law or public policy.

Provision: Section 112, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Effect of the provision: Conclusive proof of legitimacy Only exception: No access between the spouses Related provision: Section 12, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Why it matters for exams: Section 112 is one of the few provisions of the Indian Evidence Act that creates conclusive proof, and the single exception of non-access is a standard objective question.
Kerala PSCUPSC
6 October 2026 Source: LiveLaw

In plain words

Conclusive proof Conclusive proof — A fact the court must treat as proved, which no further evidence is allowed to disprove except as the statute itself permits.

Non-access Non-access — Proof that the husband and wife had no opportunity of being together at the time the child could have been conceived.