National 6 of 11

Supreme Court refers the two-child disqualification ruling in Javed to a larger bench

The Supreme Court has held that laws penalising people for having more than two children have lost their relevance, and has referred the 2003 judgment in Javed v. State of Haryana to a larger bench. Javed, decided by three judges, had upheld a provision of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 that disqualified candidates with more than two living children from local body elections. The present case came from Mangala Bhimrao, a former Sarpanch of Kakoda Gram Panchayat, who was disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 after the birth of her third child. Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe set aside the disqualification. The bench noted that India's total fertility rate has fallen from 3 at the time of Javed to 1.9, below the replacement level of 2.1, and warned of an ageing population. It said such a bar excludes a whole class of citizens from political representation and touches reproductive autonomy under Article 21. The Court asked counsel to compile a list of State laws that bar candidates with more than two children.

Judgment referred to a larger bench: Javed v. State of Haryana (2003) India's total fertility rate now: 1.9 Replacement level: 2.1
Why it matters for exams: Javed v. State of Haryana, the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and the replacement-level fertility rate of 2.1 are the three durable facts a two-child norm question rests on.
Kerala PSCUPSC
4 November 2026 Source: LiveLaw report

In plain words

TFR Total Fertility Rate — The average number of children a woman would bear over her reproductive life.

On a phone, swipe left or right to move between stories.